Whichever setting you choose, it's recommended you overclock your CPU for vastly improved performance.
I run a farely beefy rig, but even then I still found crushing frame drops which really hurt my experience with the game. Higher detail levels improve things further, but beyond 75% we noted no improvement whatsoever. For me, 45% was the first level to offer decent-enough detail at mid range, and shadows, without egregious amounts of pop-in. The answer is of course 100%, but during gameplay you'll be hard pressed to notice much of the added detail as you sprint and jump throughout the environment, especially if you enable Motion Blur. This alone costs nearly 10 frames per second, and arguably reduces overall image quality because of their pixelated appearance (fine detail doesn't render well at distance at a comparatively low resolution like 1920x1080). From about 75% and up, many low-quality tree facsimiles are swapped for the real thing, making their up-close appearance visible at long range. In the latter half, added detail is improved in quality, and extreme distance detail introduced. In the lower half of its twenty-step slider, the View Distance setting adds detail at medium and long ranges, making the aforementioned game elements visible the first time, or more visible through the addition of extra detail. Many of these features also fail to cast shadows at lower qualities, which in some scenes can greatly diminish image quality. With the removal of key geometry off the table, View Distance's attentions are instead turned towards extra, non-essential building detail, zombies, vehicles, objects, trees, and cliffs.
In Dying Light, however, the world is permanently visible as the player needs to plan their parkour route from A to B. In many other games a View Distance setting would reduce the overall visibility of the world, adding fog to hide detail, to improve the framerate. Of all settings, View Distance has the largest impact on performance, reducing framerates by more than half at 1920x1080. This is the big one! The one that everyone is bitc**ng about. Stepping up to NVIDIA HBAO+, according to Nvidia, there is a negligble impact on frames. In a wide view filled with geometry and objects, SSAO costs a little under 5 frames per second, and offers a large improvement on image quality. If you want a higher res version of these images, click here:) ( Note: It's pretty difficult to see the differences between the two in both sets of images, thanks to Steam's compression of the files. However it will often destroy frame rates unless properly optimised. With AO disabled entirely, the difference when enabling HBAO+ is even more drastic as the interactive comparison below demonstrates.ĪO in modern games - when disabled, the detail on the wall vanishes, making it appear flat, and the cable is shown to be hanging loose, rather than flush against the wall.
#Dying light steam grid free#
As the interactive comparisons below demonstrate, HBAO+ produces vastly superior AO shadows, free from the unrealistic halos that are clearly visible around the lampshades and fan. For HBAO+, enable 'Ambient Occlusion' and 'NVIDIA HBAO+'. For SSAO, simply enable the 'Ambient Occlusion' option in-game. In Dying Light, players can pick between Screen Space Ambient Occlusion (SSAO), and NVIDIA HBAO+. Without Ambient Occlusion, scenes look flat and unrealistic, and objects appear as if they are floating.
The AO technique used and the quality of the implementation affects the shadowing’s accuracy and whether new shadows are formed when the level of occlusion is low. You can follow me, and see the rest of my guides here:Īmbient Occlusion (AO) adds contact shadows where two surfaces or objects meet, and where an object blocks light from reaching another nearby game element. Now with out further ado, let's get stuck in!. Secondly, they've introduced a dynamic day-night cycle, which throws the usual fairly docile zombies into roid rage fits that will make them a serious threat. This negates the usual back and forth drudgery of open-world games. First and foremost, freerunning adds verticality to the world and gives you the ability to avoid Zombies by running over the buildings roofs, risking life and limb of course. However, there is a lot more going on under the hood in this game than people may initially think. Both games are developed by the devs known as Techland, who seem to do Zombie FPS action combat VERY well. In this guide we’ll examine these features, reveal Dying Light's PC-only upgrades, show comparisons that highlight their benefits, and evaluate their performance impact.īehind the scenes, Dying Light may look like a carbon copy of another Dead Island. There are new and enhanced visuals, and support for larger worlds filled with more detail.
#Dying light steam grid upgrade#
'Dying Light' receives a technical upgrade with the introduction of Chrome Engine 6, the latest iteration of Techland's self-developed engine.
0 kommentar(er)
